<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FOXPRO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/index.php/2009/02/15/foxpro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/</link>
	<description>The official Matt Hughes weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:19:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-2/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-626</guid>
		<description>Well said Brad!!!

1*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Brad!!!</p>
<p>1*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Collins</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-2/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 01:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Having been a police officer for 32 years I feel I may be able to add  little insight to this discussion from another perspective.  First and foremost folks you need to understand that no amount of laws or restrictions will stop the bad guy from getting a gun.  They are criminals not because they abide by the law but because they break it.  Ammo tracking, Ammo taxing, it&#039;s all another avenue to gun control.  They hope to make the price of ammo so high that we can&#039;t afford it.  You have to understand it&#039;s all politics and nothing else.  It&#039;s all about power, plain and simple.  The radical left wants total control.  Gun owners can point to instance after instance where guns have saved lives.   On the other hand the radical left gun grabbers cannot give one instance where gun control has reduced crime.  Australia more recently.  Crime increased.  In concealed carry states crime has went down.   Chicago, &quot;Crook&quot; county is as good od example as any.  They have had a gun ban for years and they still have one of the highest murder rates and crime rates in the nation.  There&#039;s an old saying &quot;Outlaw guns and no one but outlaws will have guns&quot;.  That&#039;s simple truth.  The new attorney general Eric Holder has already started Obama&#039;s move to gun control.  He is using Mexico as an excuse to reinstate the expired assualt rifle ban.  It&#039;s laughable !!!  The little girl from Texas has it right.  Watch that video again and pay attention to it.   Go back in history and take a look at gun control.  Hitler and Stalin used it effectively.  The state of Illinois has the FOID card that registers the firearm owner.  No one but law abiding citizens follow the law.  I&#039;ve arrested many a criminal on various charges involving guns.  Know that?  Not one of them had a FOID card but they had guns. Outlaw the gun the result would still be the same.  The bad guy will still have his gun whether he be the local mope on the street or a terrorist.  Only solution is for law abiding citizens to be able to protect themselves from that element.  The cops can&#039;t be everywhere.  Sometimes we have no one but ourselves to protect our lives, our familys and our property.  Matt is a God fearing man and the last thing he would want to do is kill another human being but I&#039;m sure he would be the first to say that he would if it were to protect his family from great bodily harm.  The forefathers gave us the 2nd ammendment to protect ourselves from a tyranical government.   Even that may be in the making now more than ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been a police officer for 32 years I feel I may be able to add  little insight to this discussion from another perspective.  First and foremost folks you need to understand that no amount of laws or restrictions will stop the bad guy from getting a gun.  They are criminals not because they abide by the law but because they break it.  Ammo tracking, Ammo taxing, it&#8217;s all another avenue to gun control.  They hope to make the price of ammo so high that we can&#8217;t afford it.  You have to understand it&#8217;s all politics and nothing else.  It&#8217;s all about power, plain and simple.  The radical left wants total control.  Gun owners can point to instance after instance where guns have saved lives.   On the other hand the radical left gun grabbers cannot give one instance where gun control has reduced crime.  Australia more recently.  Crime increased.  In concealed carry states crime has went down.   Chicago, &#8220;Crook&#8221; county is as good od example as any.  They have had a gun ban for years and they still have one of the highest murder rates and crime rates in the nation.  There&#8217;s an old saying &#8220;Outlaw guns and no one but outlaws will have guns&#8221;.  That&#8217;s simple truth.  The new attorney general Eric Holder has already started Obama&#8217;s move to gun control.  He is using Mexico as an excuse to reinstate the expired assualt rifle ban.  It&#8217;s laughable !!!  The little girl from Texas has it right.  Watch that video again and pay attention to it.   Go back in history and take a look at gun control.  Hitler and Stalin used it effectively.  The state of Illinois has the FOID card that registers the firearm owner.  No one but law abiding citizens follow the law.  I&#8217;ve arrested many a criminal on various charges involving guns.  Know that?  Not one of them had a FOID card but they had guns. Outlaw the gun the result would still be the same.  The bad guy will still have his gun whether he be the local mope on the street or a terrorist.  Only solution is for law abiding citizens to be able to protect themselves from that element.  The cops can&#8217;t be everywhere.  Sometimes we have no one but ourselves to protect our lives, our familys and our property.  Matt is a God fearing man and the last thing he would want to do is kill another human being but I&#8217;m sure he would be the first to say that he would if it were to protect his family from great bodily harm.  The forefathers gave us the 2nd ammendment to protect ourselves from a tyranical government.   Even that may be in the making now more than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 00:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-568</guid>
		<description>Yoshi,

As long as unfair prices aren&#039;t attached to it I wouldn&#039;t mind as much...but it&#039;s still the government controlling the law abiding citizens and that&#039;s what I&#039;m (a conservative) is against. I doubt this legislation will get very far but it&#039;s scary  that it could..because it&#039;s punishes the law abiding people more than the criminals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yoshi,</p>
<p>As long as unfair prices aren&#8217;t attached to it I wouldn&#8217;t mind as much&#8230;but it&#8217;s still the government controlling the law abiding citizens and that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m (a conservative) is against. I doubt this legislation will get very far but it&#8217;s scary  that it could..because it&#8217;s punishes the law abiding people more than the criminals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoshi</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-546</guid>
		<description>okay Jon.

I agree with you. Do you agree with this though?

How about, there is no tax on the ammo.

But... 

There is a tracking code. 

Sound fair enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay Jon.</p>
<p>I agree with you. Do you agree with this though?</p>
<p>How about, there is no tax on the ammo.</p>
<p>But&#8230; </p>
<p>There is a tracking code. </p>
<p>Sound fair enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoshi</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-545</guid>
		<description>Okay,

So how about this compromise.

I agree. There is NO REASON prices should rise for bullets, UNLESS, it&#039;s SUPPLY and DEMAND affecting the price. I know it doesn&#039;t cost .05 cents per bullet to put that code on... that&#039;s a tax, and we don&#039;t need it. Agree 100% with you. 

BUT... and this is a bit BUT:

I don&#039;t see why they can&#039;t put tracking codes on the bullets though. I think that&#039;s a good idea, just like have a license plate on your car is a good idea, just like fingerprints are good ideas, and just like passports are good ideas...

If someone I know gets shot, I want to know where that bullet was last. 

Then I&#039;m going over to find that person with my own tracked bullets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay,</p>
<p>So how about this compromise.</p>
<p>I agree. There is NO REASON prices should rise for bullets, UNLESS, it&#8217;s SUPPLY and DEMAND affecting the price. I know it doesn&#8217;t cost .05 cents per bullet to put that code on&#8230; that&#8217;s a tax, and we don&#8217;t need it. Agree 100% with you. </p>
<p>BUT&#8230; and this is a bit BUT:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see why they can&#8217;t put tracking codes on the bullets though. I think that&#8217;s a good idea, just like have a license plate on your car is a good idea, just like fingerprints are good ideas, and just like passports are good ideas&#8230;</p>
<p>If someone I know gets shot, I want to know where that bullet was last. </p>
<p>Then I&#8217;m going over to find that person with my own tracked bullets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Yoshi, Kyle, and whoever else thinks this won&#039;t infringe our rights

Prices will go up more than a few cents....5 cents per round is what I&#039;m hearing...50 rounds per box ups the price per box $2.50...myself and most other gun owners buy several boxes at a time...so we&#039;re talk about 5,10,15 dollars per transaction. I&#039;m not paying that much more per box (prices have been going up as it is) so what will happen is people will buy less ammo...and in return they will produce less which means less workers in the ammo factory...and possible job cuts in local gun shops (which do not make a lot of money to begin with). It&#039;s this crazy left wing idea that taking guns, ammo, etc will reduce crime...and it will until the criminals find a way around it AND they will find a way around it. I&#039;ve lived in many places around the world being a former army brat and even the places where it&#039;s rare that regular people have firearms STILL have problems with crime. It&#039;s not going away for criminals it&#039;s a job just like you and I go to work everyday...that&#039;s what they do. Jacking up prices isn&#039;t going to help reduce crime (if that&#039;s the point of this legislation).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yoshi, Kyle, and whoever else thinks this won&#8217;t infringe our rights</p>
<p>Prices will go up more than a few cents&#8230;.5 cents per round is what I&#8217;m hearing&#8230;50 rounds per box ups the price per box $2.50&#8230;myself and most other gun owners buy several boxes at a time&#8230;so we&#8217;re talk about 5,10,15 dollars per transaction. I&#8217;m not paying that much more per box (prices have been going up as it is) so what will happen is people will buy less ammo&#8230;and in return they will produce less which means less workers in the ammo factory&#8230;and possible job cuts in local gun shops (which do not make a lot of money to begin with). It&#8217;s this crazy left wing idea that taking guns, ammo, etc will reduce crime&#8230;and it will until the criminals find a way around it AND they will find a way around it. I&#8217;ve lived in many places around the world being a former army brat and even the places where it&#8217;s rare that regular people have firearms STILL have problems with crime. It&#8217;s not going away for criminals it&#8217;s a job just like you and I go to work everyday&#8230;that&#8217;s what they do. Jacking up prices isn&#8217;t going to help reduce crime (if that&#8217;s the point of this legislation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Brad,

My comments are not contradictory at all. They might be if it were true that guns might help fight the people I am referring to, but unfortuneately bringing guns to the type of situation I am trying to open everyone&#039;s eyes to would be all but useless. Perhaps if people had the technology to create an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) coupled with heavy firepower, that might be of some use, but from what I understand they have figured out how to avoid being affected by an EMP.

I will not further dilute this discussion on gun laws. Many are useful, some have positives and negatives all wrapped up into a nice little package.

Debate away.

Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>My comments are not contradictory at all. They might be if it were true that guns might help fight the people I am referring to, but unfortuneately bringing guns to the type of situation I am trying to open everyone&#8217;s eyes to would be all but useless. Perhaps if people had the technology to create an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) coupled with heavy firepower, that might be of some use, but from what I understand they have figured out how to avoid being affected by an EMP.</p>
<p>I will not further dilute this discussion on gun laws. Many are useful, some have positives and negatives all wrapped up into a nice little package.</p>
<p>Debate away.</p>
<p>Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoshi</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Well Brad,

point taken. But I think the price of ammo is going up, what, a few cents? It won&#039;t really cost much, nor affect the demand for bullets. And I don&#039;t think it would affect manufacturing jobs... I mean, we are talking a few cents on ammo. And I think the demand for ammo is pretty inelastic, meaning, a small price increase doesn&#039;t really affect the demand that much. I mean, a person only needs a few spare bullets for the intruders that may or may not break in. 

Yea, it&#039;s illegal to shoot people. But only if you are caught do you get convicted. I want to make it easier for the police to track you if one of those bullets ends up somewhere where it shouldn&#039;t.

It&#039;s the same concept as FedEx or the Post Office with the tracking codes... I like to know where my package is, who signed it last, and where it is now, and when it is coming... tracking codes will make the police more efficient in solving crimes and that efficiency saves money...

But your point is well taken. Maybe it&#039;ll just create a black market for ammo, this really isn&#039;t my field of expertise. I&#039;d have to see more intelligent, peer-reviewed research on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Brad,</p>
<p>point taken. But I think the price of ammo is going up, what, a few cents? It won&#8217;t really cost much, nor affect the demand for bullets. And I don&#8217;t think it would affect manufacturing jobs&#8230; I mean, we are talking a few cents on ammo. And I think the demand for ammo is pretty inelastic, meaning, a small price increase doesn&#8217;t really affect the demand that much. I mean, a person only needs a few spare bullets for the intruders that may or may not break in. </p>
<p>Yea, it&#8217;s illegal to shoot people. But only if you are caught do you get convicted. I want to make it easier for the police to track you if one of those bullets ends up somewhere where it shouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same concept as FedEx or the Post Office with the tracking codes&#8230; I like to know where my package is, who signed it last, and where it is now, and when it is coming&#8230; tracking codes will make the police more efficient in solving crimes and that efficiency saves money&#8230;</p>
<p>But your point is well taken. Maybe it&#8217;ll just create a black market for ammo, this really isn&#8217;t my field of expertise. I&#8217;d have to see more intelligent, peer-reviewed research on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-1/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Yoshi,

&quot;The only people who should have a problem with the police keeping tabs on our firearms are people who intend to commit crimes and engage in illicit activity with their weapons.&quot;

This silly ammo law will drive the cost of ammo up, potentially cost Americans in the firearm manufacturing industry jobs, and really only inconvenience those of us who actually follow the existing laws.  I mean, do you really think a person who is willing to use a gun in a violent crime is going to worry about the &quot;firearm accountability act&quot;?

Last time I checked, it was pretty much illegal to shoot people.  Last time I checked, fully automatic weapons were pretty much illegal.  I can&#039;t really see how the ammo accountability act is going to do anything other than be a pain in the neck to those of us law-abiding hunters and gun-owners, and potentially damage a significant portion of the U.S. economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yoshi,</p>
<p>&#8220;The only people who should have a problem with the police keeping tabs on our firearms are people who intend to commit crimes and engage in illicit activity with their weapons.&#8221;</p>
<p>This silly ammo law will drive the cost of ammo up, potentially cost Americans in the firearm manufacturing industry jobs, and really only inconvenience those of us who actually follow the existing laws.  I mean, do you really think a person who is willing to use a gun in a violent crime is going to worry about the &#8220;firearm accountability act&#8221;?</p>
<p>Last time I checked, it was pretty much illegal to shoot people.  Last time I checked, fully automatic weapons were pretty much illegal.  I can&#8217;t really see how the ammo accountability act is going to do anything other than be a pain in the neck to those of us law-abiding hunters and gun-owners, and potentially damage a significant portion of the U.S. economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2009/02/15/foxpro/comment-page-1/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=280#comment-507</guid>
		<description>Kyle,

You seem like a bright person, but your comments seem a little contradictory.  I mean, if you truly think we are living in a dictatorship, then it would seem to me that you would be a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, because (IMHO) it was written to prevent EXACTLY what you are describing...an oppressive government (or dictatorship, in your words).

Again, gun control laws really only punish the folks who actually ABIDE BY THE LAWS.  We need guns to protect us from those who do not follow the law (and that includes the Second Amendment).  

The boost that gun enthusiasts and hunters give the economy surely doesn&#039;t hurt either.  Oddly enough, the election of Barack Obama has been the best thing to happen to the firearm industry in years.  It would be IDIOTIC to pass laws hampering one of the few thriving industries we still actually have here in America (yes, there are still many firearm manufacturers in the United States...not to mention hunting lodges, gun shops, and the numerous other businesses that profit directly or indirectly from hunting and the shooting sports).  

Guns are flying off the shelves in record numbers in fear of stricter gun control laws.  In fact, I tried to order an AR 15 a few months ago and was told that the manufacturer was nearly a year behind on existing orders.  It&#039;s getting harder to find semi auto pistols for the same reason.  Kind of ironic isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle,</p>
<p>You seem like a bright person, but your comments seem a little contradictory.  I mean, if you truly think we are living in a dictatorship, then it would seem to me that you would be a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, because (IMHO) it was written to prevent EXACTLY what you are describing&#8230;an oppressive government (or dictatorship, in your words).</p>
<p>Again, gun control laws really only punish the folks who actually ABIDE BY THE LAWS.  We need guns to protect us from those who do not follow the law (and that includes the Second Amendment).  </p>
<p>The boost that gun enthusiasts and hunters give the economy surely doesn&#8217;t hurt either.  Oddly enough, the election of Barack Obama has been the best thing to happen to the firearm industry in years.  It would be IDIOTIC to pass laws hampering one of the few thriving industries we still actually have here in America (yes, there are still many firearm manufacturers in the United States&#8230;not to mention hunting lodges, gun shops, and the numerous other businesses that profit directly or indirectly from hunting and the shooting sports).  </p>
<p>Guns are flying off the shelves in record numbers in fear of stricter gun control laws.  In fact, I tried to order an AR 15 a few months ago and was told that the manufacturer was nearly a year behind on existing orders.  It&#8217;s getting harder to find semi auto pistols for the same reason.  Kind of ironic isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.367 seconds -->
