<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservatism is Calling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/index.php/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/</link>
	<description>The official Matt Hughes weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:19:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78966</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 02:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78966</guid>
		<description>Matt,
Why were you left off the round table discussion with the great welter weights last week.  Glazer had Penn, St. Pierre, Renzo Gracie and that Dough Boy Seirra.  What a disgrace to you and the UFC for Seirra to be included as one of the best Welter Weights ever.  Gracie should not have been there either but I can live that him being there.  You may have retired but dont let them leave you out and over shadow your legacy to the sport of MMA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
Why were you left off the round table discussion with the great welter weights last week.  Glazer had Penn, St. Pierre, Renzo Gracie and that Dough Boy Seirra.  What a disgrace to you and the UFC for Seirra to be included as one of the best Welter Weights ever.  Gracie should not have been there either but I can live that him being there.  You may have retired but dont let them leave you out and over shadow your legacy to the sport of MMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Peterson</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78960</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78960</guid>
		<description>Anyone has extra calendars?  Take them to you local nursing home, they will love you for them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone has extra calendars?  Take them to you local nursing home, they will love you for them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Peterson</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78955</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 10:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78955</guid>
		<description>I agree r-dawg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree r-dawg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r-dawg</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78949</link>
		<dc:creator>r-dawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78949</guid>
		<description>fox news actually has a good piece on entitlements govt officials get: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/29/benefits-members-congress-shabby/

republicans and tea party politicians also get free entitlements, for roger peterson it&#039;s inaccurate (and also way to easy) to assume ONLY dems push welfare.  any govt official that publicly speaks against entitlements acts differently in private. they have no problems in giving themselves plenty of entitlements, so it&#039;s hard for me to take them seriously (democrat, republican, i don&#039;t care).

if they speak against govt run healthcare know that they get FREE govt healthcare.

both repub &amp; dems voted to give themselves an automatic yearly pay raise with no performance evaluation and regardless of whether their constituents think they deserve a raise. automatic $5K added to salary every year.

congress has suggested changing the retirement age for all americans from 65 to 70/75. they can retire at age 50 and collect a *government* pension (they don&#039;t need a 401k)

g.w. bush told the public don&#039;t rely on govt/social security - save up your own IRA or 401K. every pres, whether dem or repub, only has to work 4-8 yrs. when they retire they get an *unlimited* amt of money (bush &amp; clinton are the highest spenders on frivolous things - all paid for by your taxes).

congress has cut funding for public transit saying it should be privatized. they have their own FREE govt-run subway just for them in DC.

they also get 62 days off paid in addition to 3 weeks vacation.

there is no &quot;battle&quot; b/w dems and repub when it comes to lining their own pockets. they are capable of being bi-partisan. thinking only one party is supporting the welfare system is not a smart way to make america better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fox news actually has a good piece on entitlements govt officials get: <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/29/benefits-members-congress-shabby/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/29/benefits-members-congress-shabby/</a></p>
<p>republicans and tea party politicians also get free entitlements, for roger peterson it&#8217;s inaccurate (and also way to easy) to assume ONLY dems push welfare.  any govt official that publicly speaks against entitlements acts differently in private. they have no problems in giving themselves plenty of entitlements, so it&#8217;s hard for me to take them seriously (democrat, republican, i don&#8217;t care).</p>
<p>if they speak against govt run healthcare know that they get FREE govt healthcare.</p>
<p>both repub &amp; dems voted to give themselves an automatic yearly pay raise with no performance evaluation and regardless of whether their constituents think they deserve a raise. automatic $5K added to salary every year.</p>
<p>congress has suggested changing the retirement age for all americans from 65 to 70/75. they can retire at age 50 and collect a *government* pension (they don&#8217;t need a 401k)</p>
<p>g.w. bush told the public don&#8217;t rely on govt/social security &#8211; save up your own IRA or 401K. every pres, whether dem or repub, only has to work 4-8 yrs. when they retire they get an *unlimited* amt of money (bush &amp; clinton are the highest spenders on frivolous things &#8211; all paid for by your taxes).</p>
<p>congress has cut funding for public transit saying it should be privatized. they have their own FREE govt-run subway just for them in DC.</p>
<p>they also get 62 days off paid in addition to 3 weeks vacation.</p>
<p>there is no &#8220;battle&#8221; b/w dems and repub when it comes to lining their own pockets. they are capable of being bi-partisan. thinking only one party is supporting the welfare system is not a smart way to make america better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Peterson</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78948</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78948</guid>
		<description>Britian rasied their mtaxes and what happen??  2/3rds of their millionaries left the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britian rasied their mtaxes and what happen??  2/3rds of their millionaries left the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Peterson</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78947</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78947</guid>
		<description>Give a man a fish and h eats for a day.   Give a man a welfare check, a free cellphone, food stamps, section 8 housing, a six-pack of beer and he&#039;ll vote for a Democrat the rest of his life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give a man a fish and h eats for a day.   Give a man a welfare check, a free cellphone, food stamps, section 8 housing, a six-pack of beer and he&#8217;ll vote for a Democrat the rest of his life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Peterson</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78943</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78943</guid>
		<description>Our military rejected Barak Obama by a 2 to 1 margin, 67% of our active and retired military
did not want Obama as their commander in chief, but the,liberals still voted for Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our military rejected Barak Obama by a 2 to 1 margin, 67% of our active and retired military<br />
did not want Obama as their commander in chief, but the,liberals still voted for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78940</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78940</guid>
		<description>Matt,
https://sites.google.com/site/mydreamchurch/
If you are disillusioned with religion... my dream church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/mydreamchurch/" rel="nofollow">https://sites.google.com/site/mydreamchurch/</a><br />
If you are disillusioned with religion&#8230; my dream church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jgrubb</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78938</link>
		<dc:creator>Jgrubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78938</guid>
		<description>http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig4/ellis1.html

Or perhaps welfare itself is unconstitutional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig4/ellis1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig4/ellis1.html</a></p>
<p>Or perhaps welfare itself is unconstitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NateR</title>
		<link>http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/2012/11/03/conservatism-is-calling/comment-page-1/#comment-78933</link>
		<dc:creator>NateR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matt-hughes.com/blog1/?p=1300#comment-78933</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never understood how requiring drug tests for welfare recipients would be considered unconstitutional.  Since that federal assistance is paid for by taxpayers, then every precaution needs to be taken to ensure that people are not abusing the privilege.  If you are living off of taxpayer money, then you need to be held accountable to those very same taxpayers.  If that requires invasions of privacy, then so be it.  Otherwise there is no incentive to get off of welfare, unemployment, food stamps, or any other form of government assistance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never understood how requiring drug tests for welfare recipients would be considered unconstitutional.  Since that federal assistance is paid for by taxpayers, then every precaution needs to be taken to ensure that people are not abusing the privilege.  If you are living off of taxpayer money, then you need to be held accountable to those very same taxpayers.  If that requires invasions of privacy, then so be it.  Otherwise there is no incentive to get off of welfare, unemployment, food stamps, or any other form of government assistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.432 seconds -->
